Blog

don't get me wrong folks with an outside consultant could find it marginally useful.my objections consist of the fact that you are now obviously expected to have such an outside consultant to explain the standards you should be applying.why?thats dvsas job.whether you had such a consultant on your system(and keep in mind that they or indeed any other qc don't actually have to even be a tester) or merely supplying the relevant manual paperwork you aint gonna change your risk score as the same jobs being done.this is so they can check if youre employing someone to do this sorta thing without actually having to bother to go round and check.i will leave the standards for brake binds that I cant ever recall being mentioned in any test manual past or present as a discussion for another day.am I alone in this interpretation?